The effect of terms of trade on current account balance: Harberger-Laursen-Metzler effect in Arabic countries.

Hicham Ayad

Abstract


The contribution of this paper is investigating the Harberger-Laursen-Metzler effect in the context of 18 Arabic countries since it’s the first time to test it Arabic countries over the period 2000-2017,  and was tested by using the Westerlund (2007) co-integration and Dumitrescu-Hurlin (2012) causality analysis in addition to the random effects model, empirical analysis show that there is no evidence of HLM effect for all the samples in short run term and there is no long-run relationship between the variables, but there is bi-directional causal relationship between terms of trade and current account balance in the middle incom countries in the long run term.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agénor, P.-R., & Aizenman, J. (2004). Saving and the terms of trade under borrowing constraints. Journal of International Economics, 63(2), 321–340.

Arize A (1996) Co-integration test of a long-run relation between the trade balance and the terms of trade in sixteen countries. N Am J Econ Finance 7:203–215

Babayemi et. Al (2016). Panel causality between financial development and economic growth in Africa. IOSR Journal of mathematics, 12(5), 82-85.

Bahmani-Oskooee M, Alse J (1995) Is there any long-run relation between the terms of trade and trade balance? J Policy Model 17:199–205

Bleaney, M., & Greenaway, D. (2001). The impact of terms of trade and real exchange rate volatility on investment and growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of development Economics, 65(2), 491-500.

Bouakez, H., & Kano, T. (2008). Terms of trade and current account fluctuations: The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler effect revisited. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30(1), 260–281.

Broda, C. (2004). Terms of trade and exchange rate regimes in developing countries. Journal of International Economics, 63(1), 31–58.

Cashin, P., & McDermott, C. J. (2002). The long-run behavior of commodity prices: Small trends and big variability. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 49(2), 175–199.

Chinn, M. D., & Prasad, E. S. (2003). Medium-term determinants of current accounts in industrial and developing countries: An empirical exploration. Journal of International Economics, 59, 47–76.

Cialani, C. (2013). CO2 Emissions, GDP and trade: a panel co-integration approach.

Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460

Erauskin, I., & Gardeazabal, J. (2017). The terms of trade, the external balance, and the size of the net foreign asset position. International Review of Economics & Finance, 50, 245-260.

Fry, M. J. (1986). Terms-of-trade dynamics in Asia: An analysis of national saving and domestic investment responses to terms-of-trade changes in 14 Asian LDCs. Journal of International Money and Finance, 5(1), 57–73.

Hadass YS,Williamson JG (2003) Terms-of-trade shocks and economic performance, 1870-1940: Prebisch and Singer revisited. Econ Dev Cult Change 51:629–656

Hamori S (2008) Trade balances and the terms of trade in G-7 countries: panel co-integration approach. Appl Econ Int Dev 8:13–22

Harberger, A. C. (1950). Currency depreciation, income, and the balance of trade. Journal of Political Economy, 58(1), 47–60.

Hassan, A. F. M. K. (2006). Determinants of current account deficit in developing countries: The case of Bangladesh. Studies in Business and Economics, 12(1), 5–24.

Idrees, T., & Tufail, S. (2012). The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Effect: Evidence from Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics. 17(2), 87-110.

Islam F, Tahir MI, Shahbaz M (2013) Income terms of trade and trade balance: the long-run evidence from Bangladesh. Bangladesh Development Studies, 36

Jebran, K., Iqbal, A., Rao, Z. U. R., & Ali, A. (2018). Effects of Terms of Trade on Economic Growth of Pakistan. Foreign Trade Review, 53(1), 1-11.

Khan MS, KnightMD (1983) Determinants of the current account balances of non-oil developing countries in the 1970s: aN empirical analysis. Int Monet Fund Staff Pap 30:819–842

Kouassi E, Decaluwe B, Kapombe CM, Colyer D (1998) Is it real? The long-run relation between terms of trade and current account deficits: the ivory evidence. Appl Econ Lett 5:437–440

Mendoza, E. (1995). The terms of trade, the real exchange rate, and economic fluctuations. International Economic Review, 36(1), 101–137.

Misztal, P. (2010). The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler effect: Theory and practice in Poland. Romanian Economic Journal, 13(38), 129–146.

Murshed, M. (2018). The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Effect and Dutch Disease Problem: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Economics, 8(1), 134-166.

Obstfeld, M. (1982). Aggregate spending and the terms of trade: Is there a Laursen-Metzler effect? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(2), 251–270.

Otto, G. (2003). Terms of trade shocks and the trade balance of trade: There is a Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Effect? Journal of International Money and Finance, 22, 155–184.

Persyn, D., & Westerlund, J. (2008). Error-correction-based co-integration tests for panel data. Stata Journal, 8(2), 232-241.

Pinto, B. (1987). Nigeria during and after the oil boom: A policy comparison with Indonesia. World Bank Economic Review, 1(3), 419–445.

Shafiullah, M., Islam, F., & Navaratnam, R. (2018). The Harberger–Laursen–Metzler effect: evidence from five SAARC countries. Empirical Economics, 1-29.

Szomolanyi, K., Lukacik, M., & Lukacikova, A. (2016). Impact Of The Terms-Of-Trade On Business Cycles In Slovak And Czech Economies. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(10).

Ucan, O., & Unal, A. E. (2018). IS HARBERGER-LAURSEN-METZLER HYPOTHESIS VALID IN TURKEY?. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 5(2), 152-159.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License

All the articles published in JSEG are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.